How can TAR significantly streamline the document review process?
Over the last decade or so, technology-assisted review (TAR) has become a tool widely used in e-discovery – the standard legal practice for collecting and producing evidence electronically. A TAR software can be described as a computer application legal professionals use to identify relevant documents. Then, they can collect and analyze records and customize the software to identify relevant information accurately, ensure quality, and validate data.
Nowadays, most law firms depend upon external document review services or use TAR to simplify the entire document review process and other relevant processes. In complex cases that require large volumes of documents and their analysis, TAR can significantly simplify and speed up the document review process. However, that doesn’t kill the need for attorneys or paralegals. Vigilance, expertise, and a human eye for detail are the basic requirements to maximize the utilization of TAR tools and avoid discrepancies.
TAR History - When was it called a Legal Research Tool?
As we know, TAR or predictive coding is a new way for reviewing legal documents these days. Traditionally, it was done manually by attorneys and paralegals. The study by Anne Kershaw in 2005 provided electronic discovery survey data and testimony before the Federal Civil Rules Advisory Committee, determining the most efficient way to review documents.
Since then, attorneys are bringing in software technologies for reviewing documents in the legal profession. The introduction of the TREC Legal Track system in 2006, a precursor to TAR, was used to search information retrieval techniques in legal research.
In 2014, the next-generation TAR 2.0 came into existence, which provided more accurate and faster results. In less than a decade, TAR has become a crucial litigation tool with its ability to review documents in no time.
Initially, law firms were reluctant to embrace this technology due to the fear of being rejected in the courts. But approval was given to TAR in 2012 by the Southern District of uNew York Magistrate Andrew Peck.